Educational Research Analysts

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 85-1513

Edwin W. Edwards, etc., et al. Appellants.
Don Aguillard et al.

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
[June 19, 1987]

Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question for decision is whether Louisiana's "Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science in Public School Instruction" Act (Creationism Act), La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 17:286.1 17:286.7 (West 1982), is facially invalid as violative of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. …

It is equally clear that requiring schools to teach creation science with evolution does not advance academic freedom. The Act does not grant teachers a flexibility that they did not already possess to supplant the present science curriculum with the presentation of theories, besides evolution, about the origin of life. [emphasis added] Indeed, the Court of Appeals' found that no law prohibited Louisiana public schoolteachers from teaching any scientific theory. 765 F. 2d, at 1257. As the president of the Louisiana Science Teachers Association testified, "[a]ny scientific concept that's based on established fact can be included in our curriculum already, and no legislation allowing this is necessary." 2 App. E616. The Act provides Louisiana schoolteachers with no new authority. Thus the stated purpose is not furthered by it. …